The reason I trade the nearest out of the money option is because I want to leave myself room incase what I perceived to be a higher high is just a hitch in yet a larger movement. In this case, the 30 call would have given me just over $2 of reaction time should the stock move higher and I wish to hold onto my position. Plus, options near the money have the highest time value, which is what I am trying to lock in. The reason for selecting the nearest month is because time decay occurs at the highest rate in the final month of expiration. So not only will the option lose value as the stock declines, but it will lose value as the month wears on.
The major difference between a covered call and a debit spread creation is that in a covered call you own the stock where as in the spread you own a lower priced call. In the trade above I locked in a profit of $60 per option that can be deducted from the total price of the long position. This may not sound like much. If i bought 100 shares at the break out above 24 on 1/23/09, i would have spent roughly $2400. In effect I am reducing the total price to $2340 by the end of this trade. Conversely, if I had bought the $25 call upon the breakout, I would have spent about $2.50 per share, or $250 per contract. In this case, I would be significantly lowering the total per contract price of the initial call position (2.5-.6=1.9 and 2.5-1.9/2.5 = .24 or 24% reduction in total cost per long contract.) I have indicated with the big blue arrow where the call should have been sold, and indicated with the big red arrow where it should have been rebought to close the trade. .
No comments:
Post a Comment